The article “Measuring Geopolitical Risk” first appeared on Alpha Architect blog.
Traditional measures of geopolitical risk have been primarily qualitative. In this article, the authors describe and analyze not just new, but novel measures including textual analysis of news and expert reports, novel econometric methods and machine learning applications for measuring geopolitical risk and changes in geopolitical risk.
Comparing Geopolitical Risk Measures
- Ahmet K. Karagozoglu, Na Wang, and Tianpeng Zhou
- Journal of Portfolio Management
- A version of this paper can be found here
- Want to read our summaries of academic finance papers? Check out our Academic Research Insight category.
What are the research questions?
The set of novel geopolitical risk measures analyzed were grouped into three categories: Empirical measures (n=2), Textual analytical measures (n=6), and Ratings-based measures (n=3). Altogether, there were 11 measures, 2 of which lacked adequate data. All measures are described in Exhibit 1. Note the measures are observed on a daily, weekly, monthly or quarterly basis and that the original article and data source are also identified. A quick review of representative measures:
Empirical: For example, GEOVOL (observed daily) is a statistical estimate of the sensitivity of the actual price changes of financial assets due to volatility shocks to financial markets. Using the unsystematic portion of volatility of returns, the measure captures common volatility shocks affecting global markets. Consequently, investors and other market participants are able react very rapidly to changes in geopolitical risk by trading assets and hence incorporating new information into prices.
Textual: Textual analysis of newspaper articles, expert opinions, and other miscellaneous communication captures issues that people are worrying about or issues that might happen. Although the specifics used to construct the measure vary, they generally calculate the relative frequency of published articles and topics devoted to political risk.
Ratings-based: Ratings use the number of past geopolitical events or past information to make predictions of future geopolitical risks. Inputs could include the ICB Indicator or past PRS ratings.
- Are novel geopolitical risk measures positively correlated?
- Do the empirical measures based on asset prices such as GEOVOL, reflect geopolitical risk changes more promptly than textual analysis measures?
- Do the measures based on textual analysis reflect geopolitical risk changes more promptly than those based on ratings?
What are the Academic Insights?
- YES. For the most part the risk measures analyzed were positively correlated and statistically significant, especially between GEOVOL and the textual analysis–based measures. Among the daily geopolitical risk measures, the correlations ranged from 0.047 to 0.932, all significant. Among the measures calculated weekly, the correlations ranged from 0.031 to 0.178, 2 of 3 were significant. Among the measures calculated monthly, the correlations ranged from -0.303 to 0.679, all were significant with one exception.
- YES. The authors conducted lead-lag tests (vector autoregression models) to determine which, if any, risk measures dominate in terms of capturing changes in geopolitical risk. As expected, the empirical measures based on asset pricing reflected changes faster than textual and ratings-based measures. The strong correlation produced in the analysis argues for the validity of all measures as reflections of geopolitical risk. But what explains the relative superiority of empirical measures vs. textual vs. ratings-based approaches? Not surprisingly, the empirical and textual measures are superior instruments. They are constructed from prices of securities, published articles, newspapers, brokerage reports, all items that are “ex-ante” reflections of the market’s interpretation of geopolitical risks.
- YES. As expected, textual-based measures respond more rapidly to changes in geopolitical risks than ratings-based measures. The best example of a textual measure of geopolitical risk is the GPR Index, which is constructed by calculating the portion of articles that focus on threatening geopolitical issues and events in major English language newspapers. Ratings are typically constructed from expert reports of current and recent events which makes it an “ex-post” risk measure. It would be reasonable to expect the ratings measure to be a relatively weak predictive instrument.
Why does it matter?
I highly recommend this article. There are a number of contributions this article makes to any one of market participants (investors, portfolio managers, regulators, risk managers, traders). First the ability to identify, regulate and manage geopolitical risk. Second, a comprehensive introduction to the area of geopolitical risk, how it is measured and the level of validity for each type of geopolitical measure.
Visit Alpha Architect blog to learn more about this topic.
Disclosure: Alpha Architect
The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Alpha Architect, its affiliates or its employees. Our full disclosures are available here. Definitions of common statistics used in our analysis are available here (towards the bottom).
This site provides NO information on our value ETFs or our momentum ETFs. Please refer to this site.
Disclosure: Interactive Brokers
Information posted on IBKR Traders’ Insight that is provided by third-parties and not by Interactive Brokers does NOT constitute a recommendation by Interactive Brokers that you should contract for the services of that third party. Third-party participants who contribute to IBKR Traders’ Insight are independent of Interactive Brokers and Interactive Brokers does not make any representations or warranties concerning the services offered, their past or future performance, or the accuracy of the information provided by the third party. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
This material is from Alpha Architect and is being posted with permission from Alpha Architect. The views expressed in this material are solely those of the author and/or Alpha Architect and IBKR is not endorsing or recommending any investment or trading discussed in the material. This material is not and should not be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any security. To the extent that this material discusses general market activity, industry or sector trends or other broad based economic or political conditions, it should not be construed as research or investment advice. To the extent that it includes references to specific securities, commodities, currencies, or other instruments, those references do not constitute a recommendation to buy, sell or hold such security. This material does not and is not intended to take into account the particular financial conditions, investment objectives or requirements of individual customers. Before acting on this material, you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances and, as necessary, seek professional advice.
In accordance with EU regulation: The statements in this document shall not be considered as an objective or independent explanation of the matters. Please note that this document (a) has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research, and (b) is not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination or publication of investment research.
Any trading symbols displayed are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to portray recommendations.