Portfolio Manager Nick Schommer discusses how it may be prudent to sharpen the focus on sources of risk and return within one’s portfolio and seek to ensure these are not overly correlated.
- The recovery to date has been highlighted by distinct swings in leadership – between value and growth, smaller and larger capitalizations, and cyclical and secular growth stocks.
- Given fluctuating markets and changing leadership it may now be prudent to sharpen the focus on sources of risk and return within one’s portfolio and seek to ensure these are not overly correlated.
- A portfolio not dependent on specific market capitalizations, styles or sectors, but rather, focused on quality business models, may benefit from uncorrelated sources of risk and return with the potential to perform across multiple market scenarios.
In our view, the shifting nature of the COVID economic recovery has brought into focus the potential value of owning diversifying equity assets. A blend of holdings that do not look like the S&P 500® Index, are not dependent on specific market capitalizations, styles or sectors, but rather exhibit the attributes of durable business models with the potential to perform in different market scenarios, may prove beneficial at this stage in the cycle.
The COVID Recovery Has Been Swift but Uneven
Powerful fiscal and monetary stimulus, strong capital market performance and a robust housing market have positioned both individuals and corporations to reinforce a widening economic recovery. Recently, though, the Delta variant has raised fears of slowing consumer demand. At the same time, supply chain bottlenecks and raw material and labor shortages have stoked inflation concerns and the potential for stormier weather ahead from an interest rate and economic data standpoint.
Thus, we have witnessed an ongoing push-pull in markets, and the recovery to date has been highlighted by distinct swings in leadership ‒ between value and growth, smaller- and larger-capitalizations and cyclical and secular growth stocks. At the end of last year and earlier this year, cyclical, more value-oriented stocks assumed market leadership. These were companies positioned to benefit from a reopening and a normalization of the economy in industries like travel where consumers directed pent-up demand and savings. Cyclical companies ‒ which tend to have a greater degree of operating leverage and perform better during periods of higher GDP growth –rebounded strongly, in general, as the market gained confidence in a V-shaped recovery.
Diversifying Away from Big Tech
This is a stark reversal of the theme that saw the digital economy continue to thrive while the physical economy stalled at the onset of the pandemic, when a handful of large technology companies benefited directly from the COVID environment. As with any crisis, the pandemic created a set of economic challenges that exposed weakness in certain business models and created opportunity for others. As businesses and consumers became increasingly dependent on ‒ and comfortable with ‒ digital technology during widespread lockdowns, big tech companies’ prominence in the economy grew.
As it stood in August, the information technology and communication services sectors made up 39% of the S&P 500 Index (as of 8/16/21). Out of eleven economic sectors, information technology alone was larger than six sectors combined (energy, utilities, materials, real estate, consumer staples and industrials). What’s more, the largest five stocks represented nearly 22% of the index1, a level of concentration not seen even in the 2000 dot-com bubble
Many investors’ primary exposure to U.S. equities is associated with the S&P 500 Index, which represents approximately 80% of the total value of the U.S. market.2 However, the S&P 500 has become ‒ perhaps unwittingly to many ‒ an index increasingly concentrated in a handful of large-cap technology stocks ‒ a development that is certainly not without risk. This is not to say these stocks are not worth owning or are bad companies. On the contrary, they have seen strong growth in recent years. As illustrated in the table below, over the trailing three years through the end of September 2020, the S&P 500 (which is market capitalization weighted, giving greater influence to the largest stocks) outperformed the equal-weighted S&P 500, due largely to the strong performance of the mega-cap tech stocks. But, particularly as the economic recovery has broadened, we have witnessed a substantial leadership change, as illustrated in the period since September last year during which the equal weighted index has significantly outperformed.
Exhibit 1: Index Returns (%)
Source: Bloomberg, as of 16 August 2021.
Given the fluctuating nature of the recovery, this demonstrates to us the potential benefits of owning diversifying equities in other market sectors or wholly outside of the highly tech-concentrated S&P 500.
Differentiation by Redefining Value
To be clear, we do not advocate looking different from an index just for the sake of being different, nor do we suggest trying to time which market segment will be the next to outperform. Rather, taking an independent and thoughtful approach may lead investors to attractive opportunities that can provide diversified sources of return.
For instance, we believe that investors can uncover value in the market not by focusing on traditional measures, like price-to-book and price-to-earnings ratios, but by identifying companies with durable business models that have the ability to create value independent of macroeconomic conditions or market trends. This can be the case when the market misunderstands the potential profitability of a business or its growth capacity. There may also be opportunity in undervalued businesses where, over time, the market becomes willing to pay more for that business after company, industry or market events have created short-term dislocations in value.
Thus, it is our belief that by building a knowledge base of specific companies, one can assemble holdings with different sources of value and the ability to move independently to potentially create uncorrelated sources of risk and return. Likewise, we think it is particularly important in this environment to better understand changes to company business models and differences in pre- and post-COVID financials to home in on investment opportunities.
Navigating an Unpredictable Recovery
Thus far, we have seen fluctuation in the markets and changing leadership as the economic recovery progresses. We expect this to continue, and it may therefore be prudent to sharpen the focus on sources of risk and return within one’s portfolio and seek to ensure these are not overly correlated. This could be through holding stocks of different market cap and sectors, or bringing in companies with diverse sources of value, uncovered through differentiated research. With more twists and turns likely ahead, a portfolio that is less dependent on the economic cycle and that avoids unintended concentration risks may well be welcome.
1Source: Bloomberg, as of 6/30/21.
2Source: S&P Dow Jones Indices, as of 7/31/21.
Originally Posted on September 22, 2021 – Diversifying Through an Uneven Recovery
Price-to-Book (P/B) Ratio measures share price compared to book value per share for a stock or stocks in a portfolio.
Price-to-Earnings (P/E) Ratio measures share price compared to earnings per share for a stock or stocks in a portfolio.
Equity securities are subject to risks including market risk. Returns will fluctuate in response to issuer, political and economic developments.
Diversification neither assures a profit nor eliminates the risk of experiencing investment losses.
Smaller capitalization securities may be less stable and more susceptible to adverse developments, and may be more volatile and less liquid than larger capitalization securities.
Growth and value investing each have their own unique risks and potential for rewards, and may not be suitable for all investors. Growth stocks are subject to increased risk of loss and price volatility and may not realize their perceived growth potential. Value stocks can continue to be undervalued by the market for long periods of time and may not appreciate to the extent expected.
Technology industries can be significantly affected by obsolescence of existing technology, short product cycles, falling prices and profits, competition from new market entrants, and general economic conditions. A concentrated investment in a single industry could be more volatile than the performance of less concentrated investments and the market as a whole.
S&P 500® Index reflects U.S. large-cap equity performance and represents broad U.S. equity market performance.
Disclosure: Janus Henderson
The opinions and views expressed are as of the date published and are subject to change without notice. They are for information purposes only and should not be used or construed as an offer to sell, a solicitation of an offer to buy, or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security, investment strategy or market sector. No forecasts can be guaranteed. Opinions and examples are meant as an illustration of broader themes and are not an indication of trading intent. It is not intended to indicate or imply that any illustration/example mentioned is now or was ever held in any portfolio. Janus Henderson Group plc through its subsidiaries may manage investment products with a financial interest in securities mentioned herein and any comments should not be construed as a reflection on the past or future profitability. There is no guarantee that the information supplied is accurate, complete, or timely, nor are there any warranties with regards to the results obtained from its use. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Investing involves risk, including the possible loss of principal and fluctuation of value.
Disclosure: Interactive Brokers
Information posted on IBKR Traders’ Insight that is provided by third-parties and not by Interactive Brokers does NOT constitute a recommendation by Interactive Brokers that you should contract for the services of that third party. Third-party participants who contribute to IBKR Traders’ Insight are independent of Interactive Brokers and Interactive Brokers does not make any representations or warranties concerning the services offered, their past or future performance, or the accuracy of the information provided by the third party. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
This material is from Janus Henderson and is being posted with permission from Janus Henderson. The views expressed in this material are solely those of the author and/or Janus Henderson and IBKR is not endorsing or recommending any investment or trading discussed in the material. This material is not and should not be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any security. To the extent that this material discusses general market activity, industry or sector trends or other broad based economic or political conditions, it should not be construed as research or investment advice. To the extent that it includes references to specific securities, commodities, currencies, or other instruments, those references do not constitute a recommendation to buy, sell or hold such security. This material does not and is not intended to take into account the particular financial conditions, investment objectives or requirements of individual customers. Before acting on this material, you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances and, as necessary, seek professional advice.
In accordance with EU regulation: The statements in this document shall not be considered as an objective or independent explanation of the matters. Please note that this document (a) has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research, and (b) is not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination or publication of investment research.