This website uses cookies to collect usage information in order to offer a better browsing experience. By browsing this site or by clicking on the "ACCEPT COOKIES" button you accept our Cookie Policy.

The Differences in Bitcoin and Ethereum Performance Drivers

CME Group

CME Group
Visit: CME Group


Senior Economist at CME Group

At A Glance

  • Bitcoin’s price tends to follow its cost-per-transaction and its volume of trades.
  • Ethereum prices have a close correlation to bitcoin, but have seen even higher volatility.

Bitcoin’s journey began in 2009 when it was initially valued at around one cent per coin.  In 2010 it got to $1, and has since risen as high as $64,000 in a journey that has been remarkable.  The meteoric rise in its price has been accompanied by extraordinary volatility. The price surge, which is so dramatic that it is best viewed on logarithmic charts, has been punctuated by three deep bear markets: dropping 93% in 2010 and 2011, 83% in 2013 and 2014, and 82% in 2018 and 2019.  In 2021, bitcoin has retreated about 50% from its highs.   

Part of the reason for bitcoin’s volatility is its perfect inelasticity of demand.  No matter where the price moves, the supply of bitcoin increases at about the same, pre-ordained pace. 

Bitcoin supply demand

Bitcoin’s supply is perfectly inelastic and increases in supply are slowing with time.

Bitcoin’s latest bear market began at the end of April when prices peaked at around $64,000 per coin.  Since then, prices have fallen to as low as $30,000 on an intraday basis.  Were there any advance indications of its recent decline?

Here are three time series that cryptocurrency investors might find useful.

  • Cost Per Transaction: Bitcoin has had three previous bear markets in which it fell by 93%, 83% and 82%.  Each one of these bear markets came after a spike in bitcoin’s “cost per transaction.”  Cost per transaction spiked late last year, according to, rising 10-fold from about $25 per transaction to $250 or more before this year’s correction.  Bull markets that followed past bear markets didn’t begin until trading costs had fallen and stayed low for some time. 
bitcoin cost per transaction

Are bitcoin bear markets presaged by rising transaction costs of crypto exchanges? 

  • Transactions per day: the relationship between trading volume and bitcoin prices isn’t always clear, but since 2013 a rising number of transactions sometimes seemed to presage rising bitcoin prices, whereas stagnating or falling volumes sometimes appeared ahead of declines in prices.  The number of bitcoin transactions has been falling in recent months.
bitcoin transaction per day price

Transactions have often stagnated or fallen before declines in bitcoin prices

  • Difficulty: This represents the number of calculations necessary for a computer to mint a new bitcoin.  In 2010, a computer could perform as few as 10 calculations to produce a coin.  Today, it requires 25 trillion calculations on average. This means that with 18.7 million bitcoins in existence, producing the remaining 2.3 million coins will be computationally intensive and expensive.  That might not increase the demand for bitcoin, but it will, by all appearances, keep a lid on new supply. 
bitcoin mining

Does rising bitcoin mining difficulty put a floor under bitcoin prices?

What happens with bitcoin has implications for the wider crypto asset universe, including ether, the currency of the Ethereum smart contract network.  Ether is both highly correlated with bitcoin and more volatile than bitcoin.  To borrow the lingo of equity markets, this makes ether a high beta version of bitcoin.  When bitcoin prices rise, ether prices tend to rise more.  When bitcoin prices fall, ether prices tend to fall even further.  

bitcoin ehter 30 day rolling correlation

Bitcoin and ether have been highly correlated, especially since 2018

BTC ETH annualized

Ether tends to be even more volatile than bitcoin

What’s curious is that ether supply isn’t limited in the same manner as bitcoin supply.  With bitcoin, there will only be 21 million coins produced, of which about 18.7 million already exist.  By contrast, there is no limit to the total number of ether coins that can be created, but only 18 million ether can be created in any 12-month period.  One might have imagined that ether’s greater supply flexibility might dampen its volatility, but the opposite appears to be the case. 

The ratio of the annual creation of new ether to bitcoin appears to follow the ETHBTC exchange rate.  When ether prices rise relative to bitcoin, as they did in 2017 and as they have recently, this appears to incentivize the creation of additional ether coins relative to the pre-ordained number of new bitcoin being created. What this suggests is that new ether supply isn’t so much driving the price of ether as it is responding to the price of ether relative to bitcoin.

Ethereum bitcoin ratio of number of new coins in past year

When ETHBTC rises, it tends to incentivize the creation of additional ETH

This suggests that bitcoin retains a substantial first mover, incumbency advantage in the crypto currency world despite the fact that ether, as the currency of the Ethereum smart contract network, may have more practical applications than bitcoin, which is mainly used as a store of value. For many investors, bitcoin remains the first point of entry into the cryptocurrency universe and it retains a substantial role in price discovery for ether and other crypto assets. 

Originally Posted on June 9, 2021 – The Differences in Bitcoin and Ethereum Performance Drivers

Disclosure: Interactive Brokers

Information posted on IBKR Traders’ Insight that is provided by third-parties and not by Interactive Brokers does NOT constitute a recommendation by Interactive Brokers that you should contract for the services of that third party. Third-party participants who contribute to IBKR Traders’ Insight are independent of Interactive Brokers and Interactive Brokers does not make any representations or warranties concerning the services offered, their past or future performance, or the accuracy of the information provided by the third party. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

This material is from CME Group and is being posted with permission from CME Group. The views expressed in this material are solely those of the author and/or CME Group and IBKR is not endorsing or recommending any investment or trading discussed in the material. This material is not and should not be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any security. To the extent that this material discusses general market activity, industry or sector trends or other broad based economic or political conditions, it should not be construed as research or investment advice. To the extent that it includes references to specific securities, commodities, currencies, or other instruments, those references do not constitute a recommendation to buy, sell or hold such security. This material does not and is not intended to take into account the particular financial conditions, investment objectives or requirements of individual customers. Before acting on this material, you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances and, as necessary, seek professional advice.

In accordance with EU regulation: The statements in this document shall not be considered as an objective or independent explanation of the matters. Please note that this document (a) has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research, and (b) is not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination or publication of investment research.

Disclosure: Digital Assets

Trading in digital assets, including cryptocurrencies, is especially risky and is only for individuals with a high risk tolerance and the financial ability to sustain losses. Eligibility to trade in digital asset products may vary based on jurisdiction.

trading top