Of all the changes that the investment industry has undergone in recent years, the rise of passive investing is probably one of the most drastic ones. This has coincided with the waves created by unbundling and MiFID II, which has also marked the rise of the ETF market in Europe.
Observers have noted for a while how passive investing has overtaken active in terms of assets. Two years ago, Warren Buffett famously won his US$1 million bet from 2008 that the Standard & Poor’s 500 stock index would beat the average of five funds that Protégé Partners chose within a decade.
They don’t call him an Oracle for nothing, it turns out.
Below, we try to sum up the impact of MiFID II on ETFs and the rising passive investing market in three key points.
Transparency and Improved Reporting
Before MiFID II introduced greater accountability requirements, most ETF trades would happen over a phone call rather than on exchanges or through more transparent means. Not surprising, since ETFs were not even considered an asset class circa 2004. According to the FT, about 70 percent of ETF deals took place over the phone on the run-up to MiFID II.
After the new legislation came into force, a host of new market makers started registering with exchanges. BlackRock says that the number of registered market makers that provide liquidity for its iShares European ETF products grew 25 percent in 2018. This, according to the firm, also creates the need for better aggregation of trading data in one place.
Automation and Digitalisation
Platforms like Tradeweb, which enable online trading, have benefited as more ETF trading is moving to digital and automation. The FT reports that Tradeweb hit a high in June, with transactions surpassing a notional €28 billion. More than half of that value came through automated deals.
Market maker Flow Traders, meanwhile, has estimated that deal value on platforms from companies like Tradeweb and MarketAxess rose from €35 billion to €60 billion in 2018.
As passive investing is gaining over its active counterpart, questions arise over the way managers run some active funds. Earlier this year, the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority announced it would launch an investigation on underperforming active funds. The aim is to determine if those funds deliver sufficient value to investors, and the results will come out in its 2019-2020 report.
Bloomberg noted that investors reportedly took out US$100 billion from European open-ended funds in 4Q2018, citing estimates from French asset manager Amundi. Conversely, ETF trading volumes in Europe quadrupled to hit US$2.3 trillion in 2018, according to fund performance data firm Lipper.
Originally Posted on August 15, 2019 – 3 Ways MiFID II Has Helped Boost Europe’s ETF Market as Passive Investing Rises
Smartkarma daily briefs and blog posts are provided for informational purposes only and shall not be construed as or relied upon in any circumstances as professional, targeted financial or investment advice or be considered to form part of any offer for sale, subscription, solicitation or invitation to buy or subscribe for any securities or financial products. Views expressed in third-party articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views or opinion of Smartkarma.
Disclosure: Interactive Brokers
Information posted on IBKR Traders’ Insight that is provided by third-parties and not by Interactive Brokers does NOT constitute a recommendation by Interactive Brokers that you should contract for the services of that third party. Third-party participants who contribute to IBKR Traders’ Insight are independent of Interactive Brokers and Interactive Brokers does not make any representations or warranties concerning the services offered, their past or future performance, or the accuracy of the information provided by the third party. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
This material is from Smartkarma and is being posted with permission from Smartkarma. The views expressed in this material are solely those of the author and/or Smartkarma and IBKR is not endorsing or recommending any investment or trading discussed in the material. This material is not and should not be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any security. To the extent that this material discusses general market activity, industry or sector trends or other broad based economic or political conditions, it should not be construed as research or investment advice. To the extent that it includes references to specific securities, commodities, currencies, or other instruments, those references do not constitute a recommendation to buy, sell or hold such security. This material does not and is not intended to take into account the particular financial conditions, investment objectives or requirements of individual customers. Before acting on this material, you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances and, as necessary, seek professional advice.
There is a substantial risk of loss in foreign exchange trading. The settlement date of foreign exchange trades can vary due to time zone differences and bank holidays. When trading across foreign exchange markets, this may necessitate borrowing funds to settle foreign exchange trades. The interest rate on borrowed funds must be considered when computing the cost of trades across multiple markets.