Why Tariff Reversal Won’t Save The US


Visit: Schroders


Senior Emerging Markets Economist

Since the imposition of Trump era tariffs had no obvious impact on overall US inflation, or Chinese exports, it is not clear what rolling them back might achieve.

Pressure is ratcheting up on President Joe Biden to reverse the collapse in his popularity ahead of mid-term elections on 8th November by tackling rampant inflation. This week he called on Congress to suspend federal taxes on fuel and there have been hints that tariffs on goods imported from China imposed by the Trump administration will soon be rolled back.

It will be politically challenging for Biden to reverse all of the tariffs on Chinese goods. As we noted at the time of his election victory, hawkish policies towards China have become popular on both sides of the aisle in Congress. As a result, appearing to “go soft” on Beijing and opening the door for even more Chinese exports could be a major own goal – especially if lowering tariffs fails to bring down red hot inflation.

Looking at the headline data, it is easy to arrive at the conclusion that rolling back tariffs would help to lower inflation in the US and improve the fortunes of exporters in China. After all, as the charts below show, a weighted average of the 11 categories of the US CPI basket that faced tariffs rose by 2.5% during the initial phase of the trade war. They’ve increased by even more in recent years.

Meanwhile, China’s bilateral trade surplus with the US fell by about $60 billion in the nine months to March 2020 on a 12-month rolling basis. On the face of it, then, it makes intuitive sense that lowering tariffs would reverse these trends.

US core goods prices (Jan 2018=100)
China's trade balance with US shrank as tariffs were increased

However, once we start digging into the data it becomes less obvious that rolling back tariffs would have much of a positive impact on either US prices or Chinese exports.

Starting with US inflation, while the price of goods that faced tariffs did clearly rise during the trade war, the 11 broad categories accounted for less than 5% of the US core CPI basket. As a result, the 2.5% increase in prices contributed only about 0.1 percentage point to overall core inflation during the period. Given that the prices of other goods barely budged, overall core inflation remained low and stable at around 2% as tariffs were imposed.

Admittedly, the prices of those goods that face tariffs have risen sharply more recently, up by about 15% since the start of 2020. It could be argued that there was simply a lag between tariffs being put in place and the price pressures reaching consumers. However, while difficult to disentangle, it seems that these increases are as much to do with general global price pressures than the tariffs themselves. After all, core goods inflation has soared during the pandemic as the supply of many products was unable to keep pace with rampant demand.

Either way, it is not obvious that tariffs led to particularly strong upward pressure on goods prices in the US and there are probably a couple of key reasons for this.

For a start, at least some of the increase in tariffs was absorbed. It is hard to prove conclusively that levies were absorbed into corporate margins, but it is certainly the case that a depreciation of the Chinese renminbi helped to offset the impact of tariffs. As the chart below shows, the renminbi depreciated by more than 10% to around 7.20/$ as tariffs were imposed. That helped to ensure that growth in US import prices from China actually eased during the trade war.

Depreciation of the renminbi helped to offset some of the increase in tariffs
US import prices from China actually fell as tariffs increased

Meanwhile, it also appears that Chinese exporters were able to circumvent tariffs by shipping goods via third party countries. For example, China’s official trade statistics show that the trade surplus with the US fell by almost $60 billion during the trade war.

Almost half of the decline, however, was offset by an increased trade surplus with other parts of Asia – particularly South Korea, Vietnam and the Philippines. The combination of these factors helped to ensure that China’s overall trade balance continued to climb during the trade war even as tariffs increased.

Chinese exporters were able to re-route some trade to avoid tariffs

The upshot of all of this is that while the removal of tariffs may offer some marginal relief to price pressures on certain goods, it is unlikely to bring headline inflation crashing down. Goods inflation does appear to have started to roll over in recent months. However, there are at least three reasons to think that inflation will be a problem for a while longer if bottlenecks persist, commodity prices remain elevated and service sector inflation picks up.

By the same token, there is little to suggest that rolling back tariffs will significantly improve the fortunes of China’s export sector. The sector faces a steep decline in activity in the months ahead as new orders have fallen away.

New exports orders for Chinese goods have collapsed

Originally Posted June 29, 2022 – Why tariff reversal won’t save the US

The views and opinions contained herein are those of Schroders’ investment teams and/or Economics Group, and do not necessarily represent Schroder Investment Management North America Inc.’s house views. These views are subject to change. This information is intended to be for information purposes only and it is not intended as promotional material in any respect.

Disclosure: Schroders

Important Information: This communication is marketing material. The views and opinions contained herein are those of the author(s) on this page, and may not necessarily represent views expressed or reflected in other Schroders communications, strategies or funds. This material is intended to be for information purposes only and is not intended as promotional material in any respect. The material is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument. It is not intended to provide and should not be relied on for accounting, legal or tax advice, or investment recommendations. Reliance should not be placed on the views and information in this document when taking individual investment and/or strategic decisions. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. The value of an investment can go down as well as up and is not guaranteed. All investments involve risks including the risk of possible loss of principal. Information herein is believed to be reliable but Schroders does not warrant its completeness or accuracy. Some information quoted was obtained from external sources we consider to be reliable. No responsibility can be accepted for errors of fact obtained from third parties, and this data may change with market conditions. This does not exclude any duty or liability that Schroders has to its customers under any regulatory system. Regions/ sectors shown for illustrative purposes only and should not be viewed as a recommendation to buy/sell. The opinions in this material include some forecasted views. We believe we are basing our expectations and beliefs on reasonable assumptions within the bounds of what we currently know. However, there is no guarantee than any forecasts or opinions will be realized. These views and opinions may change.  Schroder Investment Management North America Inc. is a SEC registered adviser and indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Schroders plc providing asset management products and services to clients in the US and Canada.  Interactive Brokers and Schroders are not affiliated entities.  Further information about Schroders can be found at www.schroders.com/us. Schroder Investment Management North America Inc. 7 Bryant Park, New York, NY, 10018-3706, (212) 641-3800.

Disclosure: Interactive Brokers

Information posted on IBKR Traders’ Insight that is provided by third-parties and not by Interactive Brokers does NOT constitute a recommendation by Interactive Brokers that you should contract for the services of that third party. Third-party participants who contribute to IBKR Traders’ Insight are independent of Interactive Brokers and Interactive Brokers does not make any representations or warranties concerning the services offered, their past or future performance, or the accuracy of the information provided by the third party. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

This material is from Schroders and is being posted with permission from Schroders. The views expressed in this material are solely those of the author and/or Schroders and IBKR is not endorsing or recommending any investment or trading discussed in the material. This material is not and should not be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any security. To the extent that this material discusses general market activity, industry or sector trends or other broad based economic or political conditions, it should not be construed as research or investment advice. To the extent that it includes references to specific securities, commodities, currencies, or other instruments, those references do not constitute a recommendation to buy, sell or hold such security. This material does not and is not intended to take into account the particular financial conditions, investment objectives or requirements of individual customers. Before acting on this material, you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances and, as necessary, seek professional advice.

In accordance with EU regulation: The statements in this document shall not be considered as an objective or independent explanation of the matters. Please note that this document (a) has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research, and (b) is not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination or publication of investment research.

Any trading symbols displayed are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to portray recommendations.