This website uses cookies to collect usage information in order to offer a better browsing experience. By browsing this site or by clicking on the "ACCEPT COOKIES" button you accept our Cookie Policy.

Can We Get Through Tapering Without A Tantrum?

Invesco US

Invesco US
Visit: Invesco US


Senior Director, Investment Strategy

Key takeaways

Are markets headed for a tantrum?

As the Fed foreshadows the possibility of dialing back its economic support, investors are concerned about a repeat of 2013’s “taper tantrum.”

The Fed has adjusted its style

This time around, the Fed appears to be moving gingerly so as not to scare the markets and choke off the recovery.

Remember that tantrums are temporary

I would view any type of outburst as a rite of passage along the way to this cycle maturing into a more stable one.

I haven’t heard this much talk about tantrums since I had toddlers running around my house. Fortunately, I’ve graduated from having children who cry, wail, and throw themselves on the ground for little discernable reason — but now I find myself in a business cycle that is still young and potentially prone to outbursts. I find myself asking the same questions now as I did back in my earlier parenting days: “Are tantrums inevitable? Or can they be avoided?” 

Remembering the 2013 ‘taper tantrum’

To keep the analogy going, in the last business cycle (2009-2019), the infamous “taper tantrum” occurred as the US Federal Reserve began to fuss less over the economy despite the market’s concerns that the economy wasn’t yet ready for the Fed to take away the pacifier. The market staged its own version of a public meltdown: US interest rates spiked, credit spreads widened, equities sold off, and all things emerging markets plummeted.1

Today, as the Fed foreshadows the possibility of dialing back its support for an expanding economy, those who remember the last tantrum are wondering if we’re headed for another.

The calm before the storm?

The worst part about tantrums, as all parents can attest, is that you never know when they are coming. There’s a lot of speculation that another tantrum may be on the horizon. The markets had appeared to be relatively sanguine over the possibility of the Fed beginning to scale down its asset purchases. Even this week’s CNBC headline, “There’s Growing Support Within the Fed to Announce the Tapering of Bond Purchases in September,” didn’t send the markets into hysterics. US equities, as represented by the S&P 500 Index, closed Monday at an all-time high.2

By Wednesday, the S&P 500 Index had fallen by 1.7% from its high.3 Had this been just the proverbial calm before the storm? That moment when you’re enjoying your sweet, lovable toddler right before they start hitting, kicking, and ignoring rules?  

Not necessarily. Sometimes it’s just easier with the second child — er, business cycle. For one, we learn a thing or two along the way about preventing tantrums. As a first-time parent, my methods for trying to resolve a situation (“stop it,” “you’re fine,” “get over it”) would only exacerbate things. By the second time around, I had learned that simply affirming what the child is feeling (“you’re mad,” “I know that hurts,” “I’m sad for you”) is a far-better, almost magical, approach. 

The Fed adjusts its communication style

Similarly, the US Federal Reserve also appears to have altered its approach. In May 2013, then-Chairman Ben Bernanke surprised the market by saying that the Fed could “step down” the pace of asset purchases “in the next few meetings.” While there was no suggestion of a change in interest rate policy, the market nonetheless repriced its expectation for the future path of short-term interest rates 1% to 4% by mid-2015.4 It was like a parent telling a child that it’s time to leave the playground with no advance warning — that tends not to go over very well. 

This time, the Fed appears to have learned its lesson. We joke that the Fed, instead of announcing the tapering of asset purchases, has been “talking about, talking about tapering asset purchases.” The Fed appears to be moving gingerly so as not to scare the markets and tighten financial conditions, and thereby choke off the recovery. Thus far the market is pricing in only a very gradual rise in the federal funds rate over the next two years.5 Language matters in dealing with children and markets.

Today’s cycle isn’t like the last one

Second, sometimes you just get lucky with the fundamental construct of the child or business cycle. My second daughter was less prone to tantrum. It’s just the way she was built. In my view, the same can likely be said about this cycle:

  1. This time, inflation expectations are modestly elevated. In 2013, the world was still awash in the disinflationary impulses that had emerged in the aftermath of the financial crisis. The Fed was struggling to maintain inflation expectations (represented by the 2-year US Treasury breakeven) at the 2% target.6 The Fed’s proposed adjustment to its balance sheets in 2013 appeared to be in response to the Fed’s anticipation of future inflation, rather than in response to realized inflation or the market’s expectations for inflation.

    Conversely, the Consumer Price Index is currently well above the pre-COVID peak7 and inflation expectations are above the Fed’s 2% target.8 As a result, it is less likely now than it was in 2013 that an indication of tighter policy would be viewed as the policy mistake that would send the US dollar higher and risk assets lower.
  2. Many of the “fragile” emerging market countries aren’t as fragile as they once were. In 2013, the emerging market countries suffered significant capital flight as the Fed indicated its intent to taper asset purchases. At the time, many emerging market countries were running high current account deficits as their imports were far exceeding their exports.9 These countries had strong dependence on foreign inflows to finance consumption. As a result, they had acute vulnerability to currency fluctuations, resulting from their large volumes of foreign-currency debt.

    The current account picture is much different as these countries, like the US, have been consuming less and saving more. Moreover, the flow of capital into emerging markets over the past years is nowhere near as large as it was in the years prior to 2013.

    With external financing needs much lower and likely to remain suppressed as the pandemic continues to weigh on EM-domestic demand, I believe it is unlikely that EM assets will experience anything like the taper tantrum of 2013.


Just like all kids are different, so too are all cycles. Do we have to deal with another tantrum? I suppose it’s possible. Market volatility tends to occur with changes in policy. Again, you just never know with children or business cycles in the early stages of development. More importantly, I would view any type of outburst as developmentally appropriate and just a rite of passage along the way to this cycle maturing into a more stable one.


  • 1 Source: Bloomberg, L.P. Interest rates represented by the 10-year US Treasury Rate. Credit spreads represented by the Bloomberg Barclays US Corporate High Yield Option Adjusted Spread. Equities represented by the S&P 500 Index. All things emerging markets is represented by the MSCI EM Index and the JP Morgan Emerging Markets Bond Index.
  • 2 Source: Bloomberg, L.P. as of Aug. 16, 2021
  • 3 Source: Bloomberg, L.P., as of Aug. 18, 2021
  • 4 Source: Bloomberg, L.P. Based on 30-day Fed funds futures
  • 5 Source: Bloomberg, L.P. Based on 30-day Fed funds futures
  • 6 Source: Bloomberg, L.P., as of July 31, 2021.
  • 7 Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics, as of July 31, 2021
  • 8 Source: Bloomberg, L.P., as of July 31, 2021 
  • 9 Source: International Monetary Fund, as of June 30, 2021

Originally Posted on August 19, 2021

Can We Get Through Tapering Without A Tantrum? by Invesco US

Important information


Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. 

An investment cannot be made into an index.

All investing involves risk, including the risk of loss. This does not constitute a recommendation of any investment strategy or product for a particular investor. Investors should consult a financial professional before making any investment decisions.

The risks of investing in securities of foreign issuers, including emerging market issuers, can include fluctuations in foreign currencies, political and economic instability, and foreign taxation issues. 

Tapering is the gradual winding down of central bank activities that aimed to reverse poor economic conditions.

Credit spread is the difference in yield between bonds of similar maturity but with different credit quality. 

Fed funds futures are financial contracts that represent the market’s opinion of where the federal funds rate will be at a specified point in the future. The federal funds rate is the rate at which banks lend balances to each other overnight.

Breakeven inflation is represented by the difference between the nominal yield on the 10-year US Treasury and the real yield (fixed spread) on the inflation-linked investment of the same maturity.

The MSCI Emerging Markets Index captures large- and mid-cap representation across 26 Emerging Markets (EM) countries. With 1,198 constituents, the index covers approximately 85% of the free-float-adjusted market capitalization in each country.

The Bloomberg Barclays US Corporate High Yield Bond Index measures the USD-denominated, high yield, fixed-rate corporate bond market. Securities are classified as high yield if the middle rating of Moody’s, Fitch and S&P is Ba1/BB+/BB+ or below. The option-adjusted spread (OAS) measures the difference in yield between a bond with an embedded option, such as callables, with the yield on Treasuries.

The JP Morgan Emerging Markets Bond Index (EMBI) measures the total return performance of international government and corporate bonds issued by emerging market countries that meet specific liquidity and structural requirements.

The opinions referenced above are those of the author as of Aug. 18, 2021. These comments should not be construed as recommendations, but as an illustration of broader themes. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future results. They involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions; there can be no assurance that actual results will not differ materially from expectations.

Disclosure: Invesco

This does not constitute a recommendation of any investment strategy or product for a particular investor. Investors should consult a financial advisor/financial consultant before making any investment decisions. Invesco does not provide tax advice. The tax information contained herein is general and is not exhaustive by nature. Federal and state tax laws are complex and constantly changing. Investors should always consult their own legal or tax professional for information concerning their individual situation. The opinions expressed are those of the authors, are based on current market conditions and are subject to change without notice. These opinions may differ from those of other Invesco investment professionals.




All data provided by Invesco unless otherwise noted.

Invesco Distributors, Inc. is the US distributor for Invesco Ltd.’s Retail Products and Collective Trust Funds. Institutional Separate Accounts and Separately Managed Accounts are offered by affiliated investment advisers, which provide investment advisory services and do not sell securities. These firms, like Invesco Distributors, Inc., are indirect, wholly owned subsidiaries of Invesco Ltd.

©2022 Invesco Ltd. All rights reserved.

Before investing, carefully read the prospectus and/or summary prospectus and carefully consider the investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses.

Disclosure: Interactive Brokers

Information posted on IBKR Traders’ Insight that is provided by third-parties and not by Interactive Brokers does NOT constitute a recommendation by Interactive Brokers that you should contract for the services of that third party. Third-party participants who contribute to IBKR Traders’ Insight are independent of Interactive Brokers and Interactive Brokers does not make any representations or warranties concerning the services offered, their past or future performance, or the accuracy of the information provided by the third party. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

This material is from Invesco and is being posted with permission from Invesco. The views expressed in this material are solely those of the author and/or Invesco and IBKR is not endorsing or recommending any investment or trading discussed in the material. This material is not and should not be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any security. To the extent that this material discusses general market activity, industry or sector trends or other broad based economic or political conditions, it should not be construed as research or investment advice. To the extent that it includes references to specific securities, commodities, currencies, or other instruments, those references do not constitute a recommendation to buy, sell or hold such security. This material does not and is not intended to take into account the particular financial conditions, investment objectives or requirements of individual customers. Before acting on this material, you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances and, as necessary, seek professional advice.

In accordance with EU regulation: The statements in this document shall not be considered as an objective or independent explanation of the matters. Please note that this document (a) has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research, and (b) is not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination or publication of investment research.

Any trading symbols displayed are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to portray recommendations.

Disclosure: Forex

There is a substantial risk of loss in foreign exchange trading. The settlement date of foreign exchange trades can vary due to time zone differences and bank holidays. When trading across foreign exchange markets, this may necessitate borrowing funds to settle foreign exchange trades. The interest rate on borrowed funds must be considered when computing the cost of trades across multiple markets.

Disclosure: Futures Trading

Futures are not suitable for all investors. The amount you may lose may be greater than your initial investment. Before trading futures, please read the CFTC Risk Disclosure. A copy and additional information are available at

trading top