Recapping 2019: Positive, But Costly Returns
Purely from a returns perspective, 2019 appeared to be a banner year. The S&P 500 and other major equity indexes posted double-digit gains and hit new all-time highs in 2019. Investors feasted on easy money from accommodative central banks. U.S. equities set the pace, despite some high-profile wobbles. Developed markets were close behind. Sentiment towards emerging market (EM) equities remained firmly linked to a US-China trade deal, as any trace of progress led to surges in investor optimism, including the start of Q4 when EM jumped to the head of the pack. Fixed income also performed well, boosted in the first 9 months of the year by both duration and credit assets.
But it wasn’t all rosy in 2019. Returns don’t tell the whole story. Much of the returns this year were recapturing losses from Q4 2018. Low (and lower) interest rates helped stimulate asset prices across the board, but they generally failed to boost growth in the real economy. US corporate earnings for the year are likely to turn in flat. And yet, in the face of heightened uncertainty, the consumer kept the economy stable.
Long-dated US treasury yields may have finally found a floor after the much-publicized—and potentially recession-signaling—inversion of the yield curve. While the Q4 yield curve steepening was a positive for equities, duration-sensitive fixed income assets paid the price. The probability of an interest rate reduction at the December Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting dropped from a high of 60% in early October to single digits by mid-November.
Uncertainty about the trade war remains one of the biggest issues globally and continues to take its toll. Manufacturing is arguably in a recession already, hurt by the lack of a trade resolution and snail-like global growth. Its plight reflects the questions many investors should be asking as 2019 draws to a close: It’s been a good year, but at what cost? And what does it mean for 2020?
2020 Expectations: Uncertainty Is The Only Certainty
To get a read on 2020, a worthy exercise is to follow what market participants expect from central banks. The market expected liquidity in 2019 and central banks obliged. Robust equity and fixed income returns followed. But what happens if central banks turn off the free money spigot?
As the saying goes, there’s no such thing as a free lunch. But markets continue to act as if central bankers will continue to pick up the tab. At some point, somewhere, investors will get a bill. And the price may be steep. The focus should be on sustainable organic growth, not handouts from central banks. More specifically, sustained earnings growth that doesn’t come from tax cuts or share buybacks is what the market really needs. Our best bet is for this growth to come from long term structural trends such as advancements in technology or changing consumer behaviors. The market also needs businesses to invest more, though that requires more policy certainty than we have in the current environment.
Unfortunately, uncertainty is likely to remain front and center in 2020. The major themes to watch in 2020 are nothing new, but as important as ever.
US-China trade war:
Prognosticating on a trade resolution is largely a fool’s errand at this point, even though a partial trade deal may occur in 2020 We do know that the damage caused by the trade war is real. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) estimates trade conflicts could lower global GDP by roughly $700 billion by 2020, which is about 0.8% of global GDP.1 Already, capital expenditure growth for US companies is tepid and overall earnings are declining. And it appears as though global manufacturing recession may already be underway. The economies that depend the most on trade are suffering.
We do not expect a recession in the next 12 months. However, a risk in this 24-hour news cycle is that a recession becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. To this point, consumers have done their part to help the economy and they seem to be continuing to help through the 2019 holiday season. But if people become consumed by the chatter about a slowdown and curb their spending, then the math is simple: firms make less, invest less in their business, hire less or downsize. And, before you know it, we have a recession. In particular, small business sentiment and small business sales expectations, which measures small business confidence and hiring, are two areas likely to shed light on any forthcoming recession.
If anyone has forgotten, there’s a presidential election in 2020. Many Wall Street pundits have touted that the stock market will decline if a Democrat is elected, with the magnitude of decline dependent on the candidate and their policies towards health care reform, tech regulation, or corporate taxes. But with a divided government likely (there is only a small chance Democrats will take the Senate and the Presidency) either way, expect the same gridlock and policy uncertainty.
The bottom line: All indications are that the global economy will remain in a slow growth environment in 2020. Upside from here is possible even as a recession inches closer. On average, a recession typically doesn’t kick in until around 20 months after the 10-year/2-year spread inverts. So, equity and credit markets have time to benefit from potentially better economic data and corporate profits. However, after the spree in 2019, artificial stimulus from central banks and government spending is likely unsustainable.
In the analysis below, we take a deeper look at three key areas that will play an important role in investors’ portfolios in 2020: interest rates and income, global macroeconomics and geopolitics, and key thematic growth drivers.
Interest Rates Expected to Stabilize, but Investors’ Hunt for Yield Persists
2019 featured a dramatic policy shift by the Fed. Heading into Q4 2018, market participants largely expected a hawkish Fed to continue its rising rate cycle. However, in a dramatic policy shift, prompted by sluggish growth and urging by the Trump Administration, the Fed cut rates three times. The consequences were felt throughout the course of the year and across financial markets. Short rates fell in tandem with Fed policy, but many strategists who had reduced duration risk during the rising rate period missed out on a major winning trade in 2019, as the long end of the curve fell sharply as well. Other interest rate sensitive investments were impacted by the course change, benefiting areas like Utilities and Real Estate sectors and preferred stocks.
Outside of the US, low growth and inflation prompted more easing from central banks. The European Central Bank (ECB) began injecting €20 billion a month into the economy after halting asset purchases at the end of 2018, while the Bank of Japan (BOJ) signaled they were open to further interest rate cuts in the future, and China’s slowing economic growth prompted the PBOC’s first loan rate cut in three years. These actions suppressed yields on fixed income assets globally, helping bond returns, but making the search for yield even more challenging for income-oriented investors. Some investors question the efficacy of these policies to stimulate growth, concerned that central banks are running out of ammunition to support growth, particularly if the global economy were to fall into a recession.
The Fed communicated it has less desire to cut rates further should the economy stay on its current path. As of late November, the markets believed the most likely scenario is just one rate cut in 2020.2 Resilient consumer demand, the growth slowdown finding at least a temporary floor, and the declining efficacy of rate cuts is driving this outlook. However, a catalyst for further rate cuts could potentially stem from lack of progress in finding a resolution for the US-China trade war as well as other geopolitical risks. Another factor to consider is the 2020 presidential election cycle. A victory for Democrats could cause a rotation out of stocks and into fixed income assets. For investors believing that 2020 will mostly maintain the status quo – low growth, back-and-forth trade negotiations, and temporary geopolitical flare-ups – short term rates are likely to remain flat and long-term rates could trend upwards as the yield curve normalizes. Without much upside left in the fixed income market, such a scenario could drive a steady shift from bonds to stocks, supporting positive equity markets in 2020, but a bear market for duration-sensitive assets.
Such a dynamic could pose challenges for income-oriented investors, potentially forcing investors towards riskier parts of the credit spectrum that sport higher yields. Yet tight spreads and recent weakness in lower quality junk bonds may be signaling cracks in the high yield bond market. Given structural demands for income from a large retiring baby boomer population, we believe investors should consider other income-oriented asset classes. Preferred stocks, for example, offer comparable income to high yield bonds, but from higher credit quality issuers (due to their subordinated nature).
Investors looking to couple income with growth potential may look to equity-based yield strategies as well. But with high valuations in broad market indexes, dividend yields have been driven lower. The S&P 500’s current 12-month yield stands at just 1.87%, while the long-term average stands at 2.0%.3 Further, a growing preference for stock buybacks over dividend increases is transforming yield potential into price appreciation for many stocks, further hindering income (although not impacting total returns). Therefore, investors seeking equity income may need to look at more narrow strategies for yield. One solution could be Master Limited Partnerships (MLPs), which have attractive valuations and high distribution rates. In addition, covered call strategies offer a method to generate income while remaining invested in the market.
Our major takeaways for investors in 2020: continue to expect low rates, but less support from the Fed going forward. Lower credit quality bonds, which appear both expensive and risky, are likely to fall out of favor, creating potential opportunities for equity income strategies as investors continue their search for yield.
1. IMF staff estimates
2. CME Group, “CME FedWatch Tool,” Nov 25, 2019.
3. Bloomberg. Represented by the 12-month yield on the S&P 500 Index as of 12/2/19.
4. The World Bank, “Global Economic Prospects,” Jun 2019.
6. IMF, World Economic Outlook, Oct 2019.
8. St. Louis Fed; Civilian Employment data as of Oct 2019; Disposable income as of Sept. 2019.
9. Digital Commerce 360, “Global ecommerce sales to reach nearly $3.46 trillion in 2019,” Nov 13, 2019.
10. International Federation of Robotics, “IFR forecast: 1.7 million new robots to transform the world´s factories by 2020,” Sep 27, 2019.
11. Cybersecurity Ventures, “2019 Cybersecurity Market Report,” Jun 10, 2019.
Originally Posted on December 10, 2019 – Global X 2020 Outlook
Index returns are for illustrative purposes only and do not represent actual fund performance. Index returns do not reflect any management fees, transaction costs or expenses. Indices are unmanaged and one cannot invest directly in an index. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Investing involves risk, including the possible loss of principal. Diversification does not ensure a profit or guarantee against a loss. This information is not intended to be individual or personalized investment or tax advice and should not be used for trading purposes. Please consult a financial advisor or tax professional for more information regarding your investment and/or tax situation.
Information provided by Global X Management Company, LLC (Global X) and SEI Investments Distribution Co. (SIDCO). Global X and SIDCO are not affiliated.
Disclosure: Global X ETFs
Carefully consider the Fund’s investment objectives, risk factors, charges and expenses before investing. This and additional information can be found in the Fund’s full or summary prospectus, which may be obtained by calling 1-888-GX-FUND-1 (1.888.493.8631), or by visiting globalxfunds.com. Read the prospectus carefully before investing.
Disclosure: Interactive Brokers
Information posted on IBKR Traders’ Insight that is provided by third-parties and not by Interactive Brokers does NOT constitute a recommendation by Interactive Brokers that you should contract for the services of that third party. Third-party participants who contribute to IBKR Traders’ Insight are independent of Interactive Brokers and Interactive Brokers does not make any representations or warranties concerning the services offered, their past or future performance, or the accuracy of the information provided by the third party. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
This material is from Global X ETFs and is being posted with permission from Global X ETFs. The views expressed in this material are solely those of the author and/or Global X ETFs and IBKR is not endorsing or recommending any investment or trading discussed in the material. This material is not and should not be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any security. To the extent that this material discusses general market activity, industry or sector trends or other broad based economic or political conditions, it should not be construed as research or investment advice. To the extent that it includes references to specific securities, commodities, currencies, or other instruments, those references do not constitute a recommendation to buy, sell or hold such security. This material does not and is not intended to take into account the particular financial conditions, investment objectives or requirements of individual customers. Before acting on this material, you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances and, as necessary, seek professional advice.
There is a substantial risk of loss in foreign exchange trading. The settlement date of foreign exchange trades can vary due to time zone differences and bank holidays. When trading across foreign exchange markets, this may necessitate borrowing funds to settle foreign exchange trades. The interest rate on borrowed funds must be considered when computing the cost of trades across multiple markets.