Percentages, Perspective and a “Flight to Crap”


Chief Strategist at Interactive Brokers

I hate when people suggest that one can lie using statistics, but sometimes they really can be misleading.

Take for example the recent stellar-sounding rallies in a wide range of beaten-down securities.  We noted yesterday that the roughly 13% and 16% year-to-date jumps in Meta Platforms (META) and Amazon (AMZN) seem remarkable at face value but seem much less so when we remember that those stocks gave back about two-thirds and one-half of their respective values last year.  The returns are terrific if you were a very nimble trader poised for a January effect, much less so if you are a disgruntled long-term investor in one of those names.

But I wonder whether I was a bit too strident in my recent calls that we have been seeing what I have termed a “flight to crap.”  I said it on TV last Friday (on two different networks, no less) and on the radio on Tuesday morning.   It’s a catchy phrase, one I’ve used at various times on the trading desk over the years when things seemed frothy.  I became publicly attached to the verbiage when I used it in an interview with the Financial Times in 2020 and then was referenced (though not by name) in a Paul Krugman column in the New York Times.  While the term was quite descriptive for the rush into speculative assets that was occurring at the time, the speculative rally persisted for over a year afterwards. 

That was a different time, however.  Risk assets of all types were being inflated by precipitous rate cuts, massive fiscal stimulus, and an unprecedented expansion of the Federal Reserve’s balance sheet.  The stimuli lasted longer than many anticipated – and also in hindsight, much longer than they should have – so the initial flurry of speculation that prompted such commentary proved to be only the beginning of a tidal wave of excesses.

It is impossible to say now that circumstances haven’t changed dramatically.  The immediate concern regarding central bank policy is whether rate hikes will be slowing or stopping in the near future and there is little question about the path and pace of the Fed’s balance sheet reduction.  That is hardly a fertile climate for speculative assets.

Nonetheless, we have seen speculation return to the forefront.  As we started the day, bitcoin (BTC) was up about 13% year-to-date.  That’s a stellar return, but just like AMZN, BTC is about half the price it was a year ago.  Carvana (CVNA), a company whose debt is trading at highly distressed levels, is up over 50% so far in 2023.  That made a wonderful trade, but CVNA is trading about 95% lower than where it was a year ago.  I could go on and on with a long list of similar examples (like meme stocks), but I hope you get my point.  Somehow the bounces in a wide range of assets that became oversold as the result of year-end tax-loss selling morphed into a bit of a speculative frenzy.

The conflict between short- and long-term percentage changes is why I am not a fan of arbitrary declarations of bull and bear markets based strictly on percentage changes.  The Euro Stoxx 50 Index, a blue-chip European index that can hardly be considered a speculative bastion, has been on quite a tear recently.  It bottomed around 3,250 in late October and rallied steadily since.  Within a month, in late November, the index had risen 20% from its lows to about 3,900.  To some, that qualifies as a bull market.  Now that we are approaching the 4,200 level, that bull move is even more impressive.  But we remain over 5% below last year’s highs.  Can we call that a bull market yet?  Probably.  And we can almost certainly consider the UK in a bull market with the FTSE 100 at all-time highs.  We can debate the causes and the sustainability of those rallies amidst their own central bank tightening, but we can much more safely assert that we are seeing meaningful secular moves in key European benchmarks than we can assert for beaten-down US companies.

Disclosure: Interactive Brokers

The analysis in this material is provided for information only and is not and should not be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any security. To the extent that this material discusses general market activity, industry or sector trends or other broad-based economic or political conditions, it should not be construed as research or investment advice. To the extent that it includes references to specific securities, commodities, currencies, or other instruments, those references do not constitute a recommendation by IBKR to buy, sell or hold such investments. This material does not and is not intended to take into account the particular financial conditions, investment objectives or requirements of individual customers. Before acting on this material, you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances and, as necessary, seek professional advice.

The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Interactive Brokers LLC, its affiliates, or its employees.

Any trading symbols displayed are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to portray recommendations.

In accordance with EU regulation: The statements in this document shall not be considered as an objective or independent explanation of the matters. Please note that this document (a) has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research, and (b) is not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination or publication of investment research.

Disclosure: Digital Assets


Trading in digital assets, including cryptocurrencies, is especially risky and is only for individuals with a high risk tolerance and the financial ability to sustain losses. For more information about the risks surrounding the trading of Digital Assets please see the “Disclosure of Risks of Trading Digital Assets“.