Short and concise analysis on concepts or recent events in the financial markets from the ASG Capital Team.
In this podcast, we question the comparison with the 1970s.
We are hearing here and there referenced the 1970s to justify further monetary repression. The protagonists of this narrative should know better than making such comparisons.
For some of them have lived through this period, they know full well we are in different times, driven by different monetary and economic dynamics. The 1970s is a transition period out of the Bretton Woods system, put in place just after World War II:
- The financial system is not very sophisticated with a limited derivative market footprint.
- Capital controls still exists in certain advanced countries with its impact on international money flows.
- Private and public debt levels are limited.
- Central bankers are unknown civil servants.
- Quantitative easing does not even appear in any economic textbook.
- The demographic structure of the West points to a young, up and coming population looking to work and consume. They call them the baby boomers.
- China’s GDP is smaller than that of Algeria, and China is miles away from joining the World Trade Organization as a leading trading partner.
- The European Union is a small band of Western European nations forming a common market trade area without even a common currency.
- The Suez Canal is regularly closed off due to conflict in the Middle East: forcing oil tankers to take the long route round, taking three times as long to get to destination.
- A large portion of the world’s oil production is concentrated in a limited area, subject to constant geopolitical instability.
- New alternative sources of energy, such as nuclear have yet to be developed and rolled out on a world scale. Just in time is considered a dangerous management tool as supply chains could be regularly disrupted by transportation issues, dockers or train strikes, for example.
To conclude, comparing the complexities and moving parts of the 1970s to those of today. Is intellectually questionable. So too is the proposal of a 70s style solution, such as high interest rates for longer to crush today’s inflation as the supreme Monetary Authority over commercial banks, which was not the case in the 1970s, central bankers could have chosen to constrain private lending. Less credit would mean less money to chase too few goods, snipping the bud of inflation. That solution is never talked about by those same people making these comparisons to the 1970s.
This podcast is for information known only. It should not be considered as investment advice. We would recommend seeking professional investment advice when making any investment decisions.
Originally Posted January 24, 2023 – Podcast #10: 1970s Comparison
Disclosure: ASG Capital
ASG Capital is a Registered Investment Advisor. Information presented is for educational purposes only and does not intend to make an offer or solicitation for the sale or purchase of any specific securities, investments or investment strategies. Investment involve risk and unless otherwise stated are not guaranteed. Be sure to first consult with a qualified financial advisor and/or tax professional before implementing any strategy discussed herein.
Disclosure: Interactive Brokers
Information posted on IBKR Traders’ Insight that is provided by third-parties and not by Interactive Brokers does NOT constitute a recommendation by Interactive Brokers that you should contract for the services of that third party. Third-party participants who contribute to IBKR Traders’ Insight are independent of Interactive Brokers and Interactive Brokers does not make any representations or warranties concerning the services offered, their past or future performance, or the accuracy of the information provided by the third party. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
This material is from ASG Capital and is being posted with permission from ASG Capital. The views expressed in this material are solely those of the author and/or ASG Capital and IBKR is not endorsing or recommending any investment or trading discussed in the material. This material is not and should not be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any security. To the extent that this material discusses general market activity, industry or sector trends or other broad based economic or political conditions, it should not be construed as research or investment advice. To the extent that it includes references to specific securities, commodities, currencies, or other instruments, those references do not constitute a recommendation to buy, sell or hold such security. This material does not and is not intended to take into account the particular financial conditions, investment objectives or requirements of individual customers. Before acting on this material, you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances and, as necessary, seek professional advice.
In accordance with EU regulation: The statements in this document shall not be considered as an objective or independent explanation of the matters. Please note that this document (a) has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research, and (b) is not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination or publication of investment research.
Any trading symbols displayed are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to portray recommendations.