The Global Property Equities Team turns their attention to the office sector and the key question of how more of us working from home will impact the office market.
- With social distancing requirements and the heightened aversion of being too close to colleagues, there is an argument that more office space per employee could be required.
- The impact on the office sector is likely to be more negative for older and lower-quality buildings that are less able to adapt to the evolving requirements of tenants.
Right now, you may be reading this while working from home. How’s it going?
The answer is probably mixed. On the one hand, you may be enjoying the time saved from commuting, perhaps fewer distractions from coworkers (but more from the kids) and for some, even fewer meetings. But on the other hand, you’re perhaps logging more work hours per day, not being as productive as you were before and communicating less with your colleagues, resulting in an increase in stress and anxiety levels.
Indeed, well-being issues have been raised as a key concern for people working from home. In the U.S., a recent survey by USA Today and LinkedIn found that 51% of respondents felt lonely working from home, with 20% feeling lonely all or most of the time. Maintaining employee morale has proved difficult, according to two-thirds of human resources professionals surveyed by the U.S.-based Society for Human Resource Management.
Whatever your experience of working from home has been, it has shown that most office‑based employees can, by and large, work from home.
How will more of us working from home impact the office market?
Amid a global downturn, companies may look to reduce costs, with office rents often easy targets. If employees can continue to operate as efficiently at home as in the office, no doubt some businesses will rethink their office space needs. We have some sympathy for this point of view but think the impact on office demand may not be as bad as it first appears and, therefore, think that direct comparisons with the troubled retail sector are not justified.
Working from home is not a new idea. Clearly, some of those people whose jobs allow them to work effectively from home were doing so prior to COVID-19. So, there must be reasons to explain why some people choose not to work from home, even though they can.
Human beings are social creatures by nature. Research by Stanford economist Nicholas Bloom has shown that in-person collaboration is necessary for creativity and innovation, which is more likely to happen with face-to-face meetings where new ideas are often developed. “[The current situation] will create a productivity disaster for firms,” Bloom says.1
And it’s not just the creative and collaborative environment that is important: the physical environment also matters. Many people’s homes are not equipped to double up as office space. Working out of bedrooms, hallways and garages with vacuum cleaners and children as background noise may be fine in the short term, but the novelty could soon wear off. As a work-around solution, many have adapted to the new norm, but does working from home full time allow people to do their jobs as well as they did before while maintaining job satisfaction and a work/life balance?
What changes to the working environment can be expected?
Over the last few decades, you may have noticed personal office spaces getting smaller due to “efficiency enhancements.” With social distancing requirements and the heightened aversion of being too close to colleagues, there is an argument that more office space per employee could be required. At the least, we believe the steady march downward in terms of office space per person may have ended ̶ a positive for office landlords.
While it remains to be seen how office space per employee will evolve, we think the impact will be more negative for older and lower-quality buildings that are less able to efficiently move more groups of fewer people around the building while providing a healthy and adaptable work environment. Suddenly, the number of elevators per person and quality of heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems may be as important a consideration as location.
While difficult to predict, overall we think the impact on the office market will likely be negative in the coming months. The key question is to what degree and for how long? Choosing the optimal working arrangement for employees is crucial not only for companies to maximize productivity but also to attract and retain the best talent via employee happiness and engagement. While current circumstances may provide a short-term pause around office-leasing fundamentals, we do not believe competition from couches and kitchen tables represents a longer-term “beginning of the end” for the asset class. Technology has proved to be a great enabler of change, and what this working from home experiment has shown us is that you can work from home, but do you want to work from home indefinitely?
1Source: Gorlick, Adam. “The productivity pitfalls of working from home in the age of COVID-19.” Stanford News, March 30, 2020.
Originally Posted on May 26, 2020 – Why Office Is Not the Next Retail
Disclosure: Janus Henderson
The opinions and views expressed are as of the date published and are subject to change without notice. They are for information purposes only and should not be used or construed as an offer to sell, a solicitation of an offer to buy, or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security, investment strategy or market sector. No forecasts can be guaranteed. Opinions and examples are meant as an illustration of broader themes and are not an indication of trading intent. It is not intended to indicate or imply that any illustration/example mentioned is now or was ever held in any portfolio. Janus Henderson Group plc through its subsidiaries may manage investment products with a financial interest in securities mentioned herein and any comments should not be construed as a reflection on the past or future profitability. There is no guarantee that the information supplied is accurate, complete, or timely, nor are there any warranties with regards to the results obtained from its use. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Investing involves risk, including the possible loss of principal and fluctuation of value.
Disclosure: Interactive Brokers
Information posted on IBKR Traders’ Insight that is provided by third-parties and not by Interactive Brokers does NOT constitute a recommendation by Interactive Brokers that you should contract for the services of that third party. Third-party participants who contribute to IBKR Traders’ Insight are independent of Interactive Brokers and Interactive Brokers does not make any representations or warranties concerning the services offered, their past or future performance, or the accuracy of the information provided by the third party. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
This material is from Janus Henderson and is being posted with permission from Janus Henderson. The views expressed in this material are solely those of the author and/or Janus Henderson and IBKR is not endorsing or recommending any investment or trading discussed in the material. This material is not and should not be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any security. To the extent that this material discusses general market activity, industry or sector trends or other broad based economic or political conditions, it should not be construed as research or investment advice. To the extent that it includes references to specific securities, commodities, currencies, or other instruments, those references do not constitute a recommendation to buy, sell or hold such security. This material does not and is not intended to take into account the particular financial conditions, investment objectives or requirements of individual customers. Before acting on this material, you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances and, as necessary, seek professional advice.