This website uses cookies to collect usage information in order to offer a better browsing experience. By browsing this site or by clicking on the "ACCEPT COOKIES" button you accept our Cookie Policy.

3 Outperformers With Room to Soar

New Constructs

Contributor:
New Constructs
Visit: New Constructs

Last week, we looked at three of our worst Long Ideas from 2020. This week, we’re taking some victory laps for picks that outperformed from the date we published our reports through the end of 2020.

Best Buy Co, Inc. (BBY: $114/share), General Motors Co (GM: $48/share), and Hyatt Hotels (H: $74/share) are the Long Idea highlights for 2020. Despite their outperformance, we remain bullish on these stocks, and they remain open Long Ideas.

Long Ideas Outperformed in 2020

Figure 1 shows that the average return of Long Ideas outperformed the S&P 500 from the date of publication through December 31, 2020 by 5.7%.

Our Long Ideas combine our proprietary fundamental data, proven superior to traditional data providers by a paper forthcoming in The Journal of Financial Economics[1], with qualitative research to highlight firms whose stocks present excellent risk/reward. Long Ideas show investors how to use our research and the transparency of our analytical processes.

Figure 1: Long Idea Performance: From Date of Publication Through 12/31/2020

Long Idea Performance: From Date of Publication Through 12/31/2020

Sources: New Constructs, LLC

Highlight 1:

Best Buy Co, Inc. (BBY) – Since Report Publication on March 11 Through 12/31/20: Up 53% vs. S&P 500 up 37%

We first made Best Buy a Long Idea in April 2018 and reiterated it in November 2018 and March 2020. Our report in March 2020 suggested that companies with high returns on invested capital (ROIC), such as Best Buy, are best-prepared to weather financial storms. Sure enough, Best Buy’s business has become more profitable during the COVID-19-related disruptions to the economy.

What Went Right: As many business struggled during the pandemic, Best Buy thrived as growth in work from home (WFH) led to increased demand for the firm’s equipment and services. Best Buy successfully leveraged its e-commerce capabilities and distribution network to quickly serve its current customers and attract new ones. Increased revenue coupled with improved net-operating profit after tax (NOPAT) margin and invested capital drive the firm’s ROIC from 17% in fiscal 2020 to 21% over the trailing-twelve-months (TTM).

Why BBY Still Has Upside: Best Buy can continue to grow its online business with exceptional delivery speed at little incremental cost by leveraging its physical stores as a distribution network to support order fulfillment. With over 70% of the U.S. population living within 10 minutes from a Best Buy, the firm has a brick-and-mortar  presence that even Amazon would envy.

Since February 2020, Best Buy increasingly utilized its stores in fulfilling online orders. The firm now offers same-day delivery in all of its stores and next-day delivery for orders placed before 8 pm. Customers also have the flexibility to shop in store or online and pick up purchases curbside.

Furthermore, Best Buy aims to offer something most online businesses are unable to provide – quality customer service online. The firm is now providing live, online customer support to customers with its in-store staff. As the world moves towards a post-COVID economy, Best Buy is well positioned to meet consumer needs via any distribution channel.

Current Price Leaves Lots of Upside: We use our reverse discounted cash flow (DCF) model to analyze the implied value of the stock based on assumptions about Best Buy’s future growth in cash flows.

In this scenario, we assume:

  • Best Buy’s NOPAT margin falls to 3.9% (equal to fiscal 2020 compared to 4.2% TTM)
  • Revenue grows at 3% compounded annually, which is below the average annual global GDP growth rate of 3.5% since 1961

In this scenario, Best Buy’s NOPAT grows by just 3% compounded annually over the next decade and the stock is worth $139/share today – a 22% upside to the current price. See the math behind this reverse DCF scenario. Such a scenario could prove conservative given that Best Buy has grown NOPAT by 11% compounded annually since 2014.

Figure 2: Best Buy’s Historical and Implied NOPAT

Best Buy’s Historical and Implied NOPAT

Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings

Highlight 2:

General Motors Co (GM) – Since Report Publication on July 15 Through 12/31/20: Up 55% vs. S&P 500 up 16%

General Motors was one of the firms featured in our “See Through the Dip” series of reports, where we make the case for a return to pre-pandemic profitability once COVID-19 is in the rear view mirror. Though the stock has rallied from lows of $17/share in late March 2020, it still offers plenty of upside in the ongoing recovery.

What Went Right: While the pandemic greatly affected General Motors’ production and disrupted its supply chain, the firm has been able to deliver promising results in the challenging environment. In fact, in 3Q20, the firm delivered its first quarterly year-over-year (YoY) sales increase since 4Q18. The firm continues to see success as it increases its focus on EV production, too. General Motors launched a new EV in China which became the country’s best-selling EV in 3Q20.

Why GM Is Still Has Upside: As many investors look to Tesla (TSLA) to lead the way in EV, General Motors is actually better positioned to thrive in the growing EV market.

General Motors’ existing business gives it a large research and development advantage over EV startups. With existing manufacturing expertise and capacity, the firm can focus on developing EV technology, convert existing plants, and produce higher-quality EVs at scale. With the free cash flow (FCF) generated from the firm’s conventional vehicle business, General Motors plans to invest $27 billion in EV and autonomous vehicles through 2025. At only $10.9 billion over the past five years and $2.4 billion over the TTM, Tesla’s capex has been much lower than what GM plans. Tesla has not revealed what its capex going forward will be.

General Motors’ investments in EV are already paying off in the most important part of General Motors’ EV strategy: battery technology designed to easily scale across various models. General Motors’ Ultium-based EV’s will offer a range of 450 miles per charge, or approximately the same the mileage achieved from a tank of gasoline.

Once General Motors has the technology it needs, it can easily mass produce EVs with its existing and proven manufacturing capacity. By 2025, the firm plans to launch 30 new EV models. Newer firms such as Tesla must heavily invest new capital in developing their own manufacturing capabilities with the hope they can achieve comparable scale to GM.

Current Price Leaves Lots of Upside: Below we use our reverse DCF model to analyze the implied value of the stock based on different assumptions about General Motors’ future growth in cash flows.

In this scenario, we assume:

  • General Motors’ NOPAT margin improves to 5% (ten-year average vs. 3% TTM)
  • Revenue falls by 13% in 2020 and grows by 12% in 2021 and 4% in 2022 (in line with consensus estimates)
  • Revenue grows at 3% compounded annually thereafter, which is below the average global GDP growth rate of 3.5% since 1961

In this scenario, General Motors’ NOPAT grows by just 2% compounded annually over the next decade and the stock is worth $82/share today – a 71% upside to the current price. See the math behind this reverse DCF scenario. In this scenario, General Motors’ NOPAT in 2029 would still be 9% below 2017 levels.

Figure 3 General Motors’ Historical and Implied NOPAT

General Motors’ Historical and Implied NOPAT

Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings

Highlight 3:

Hyatt Hotels (H) – Since Report Publication on May 14 Through 12/31/20: Up 59% vs. S&P 500 up 32%

Like General Motors, Hyatt was also part of our “See Through the Dip” thesis. Even though challenges to the hospitality industry persist, we believe Hyatt will improve its market share during and after the economic downturn.

What Went Right: While the pandemic has been extremely challenging for the hospitality industry, Hyatt has navigated the challenges well. At the end of 3Q20, 59% of the firm’s hotels were back to operating at a break-even-or-better occupancy level.

Why H Is Still Has Upside: Even though the firm’s 3Q20 revenue is down 67% YoY, its 58% quarter-over-quarter improvement is a sign that the firm’s business is on the path to recovery. We believe the YoY decline in revenue is temporary in line with our “See Through the Dip” thesis.

This industry-wide decline in demand creates opportunity for market leaders, such as Hyatt, over the long term. Hyatt is poised to take the market share left behind by hotels that don’t survive the present downturn. With this goal in mind, the firm continues to develop its accommodations and build for the future as it increased its net rooms in 3Q20 by 6% YoY (up from 5.8% YoY growth in 3Q19).

Further recovery in travel will continue to drive the recovery in the hospitality industry. CBRE Hotels Research expects U.S. occupancy levels for hotels to reach 44% in 1H21 and 56% in 2H21. For reference, Hyatt estimates it’s break-even occupancy rate is around 37%.

Much of the recovery the firm has already seen comes from its Asian portfolio as nearly all of its properties in China, Hong Kong, Macau, and Taiwan are at pre-pandemic occupancy rates. Though parts of its business are already at pre-pandemic levels, the valuation of the firm’s stock isn’t, as we’ll show below.

Current Price Leaves Lots of Upside: Below we use our reverse DCF model to analyze the implied value of the stock based on different assumptions about Hyatt’s future growth in cash flows.

In this scenario, we assume:

  • Hyatt’s NOPAT margin falls to -35% in 2020 (below 3Q20 margin of -32%) and improves to 8% (equal to TTM margin) in 2021
  • Hyatt improves NOPAT margin to 11% (five-year average) in 2022 and each year thereafter
  • Revenue falls by 58% in 2020 and grows by 57% in 2021 and 38% in 2022 (in line with consensus estimates)
  • Revenue grows at 3.5% thereafter, which is the average annual global GDP growth rate since 1961

In this scenario, Hyatt’s NOPAT falls by 1% compounded annually over the next decade and the stock is worth $107/share today – a 45% upside to the current price. See the math behind this reverse DCF scenario. Such a scenario could prove conservative given that Hyatt has grown NOPAT by 11% compounded annually over the past five years and 26% compounded annually over the decade before the pandemic.

Figure 4: Hyatt’s Historical and Implied NOPAT

Hyatt’s Historical and Implied NOPAT

Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings

This article originally published on January 13, 2021.

Disclosure: David Trainer owns H. David Trainer, Kyle Guske II, and Matt Shuler receive no compensation to write about any specific stock, sector, style, or theme.

Follow us onTwitterFacebookLinkedIn, and StockTwits for real-time alerts on all our research.

[1] Our reports utilize our Core Earnings, a superior measure of profits, as demonstrated in Core Earnings: New Data & Evidence, a paper by professors at Harvard Business School (HBS) & MIT Sloan. Recently accepted by the Journal of Financial Economics, the paper proves that our data is superior to all the metrics offered elsewhere.

Click here to download a PDF of this report.

Disclosure: New Constructs

Disclosure: David Trainer, Kyle Guske II, Sam McBride, Matt Shuler, Alex Sword, and Andrew Gallagher receive no compensation to write about any specific stock, style, or theme.

About New Constructs

New Constructs leverages cutting-edge Robo-Analyst technology to provide insights and diligence on stocks, ETFs, mutual funds & debt issuers. Highly-respected public and private institutions believe in our concepts::

– Fundamental data and earnings: Core Earnings: New Data and Evidence

– Models for NOPAT, Invested Capital and Return on Invested Capital (ROIC): Getting ROIC Right

– Stock ratings: Robot Analysts Outwit Humans on Investment Picks

The information and opinions presented in this report are provided to you for information purposes only and are not to be used or considered as an offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell securities or other financial instruments. New Constructs has not taken any steps to ensure that the securities referred to in this report are suitable for any particular investor and nothing in this report constitutes investment, legal, accounting or tax advice. This report includes general information that does not take into account your individual circumstance, financial situation or needs, nor does it represent a personal recommendation to you. The investments or services contained or referred to in this report may not be suitable for you and it is recommended that you consult an independent investment advisor if you are in doubt about any such investments or investment services.

Information and opinions presented in this report have been obtained or derived from sources believed by New Constructs to be reliable, but New Constructs makes no representation as to their accuracy, authority, usefulness, reliability, timeliness or completeness. New Constructs accepts no liability for loss arising from the use of the information presented in this report, and New Constructs makes no warranty as to results that may be obtained from the information presented in this report. Past performance should not be taken as an indication or guarantee of future performance, and no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made regarding future performance. Information and opinions contained in this report reflect a judgment at its original date of publication by New Constructs and are subject to change without notice. New Constructs may have issued, and may in the future issue, other reports that are inconsistent with, and reach different conclusions from, the information presented in this report. Those reports reflect the different assumptions, views and analytical methods of the analysts who prepared them and New Constructs is under no obligation to insure that such other reports are brought to the attention of any recipient of this report.

New Constructs’ reports are intended for distribution to its professional and institutional investor customers. Recipients who are not professionals or institutional investor customers of New Constructs should seek the advice of their independent financial advisor prior to making any investment decision or for any necessary explanation of its contents.

In-depth risk/reward analysis underpins our stock rating. Our stock rating methodology grades every stock according to what we believe are the 5 most important criteria for assessing the quality of a stock. Each grade reflects the balance of potential risk and reward of buying that stock. Our analysis results in the 5 ratings described below. Very Attractive and Attractive correspond to a “Buy” rating, Very Unattractive and Unattractive correspond to a “Sell” rating, while Neutral corresponds to a “Hold” rating.

Disclosure: Interactive Brokers

Information posted on IBKR Traders’ Insight that is provided by third-parties and not by Interactive Brokers does NOT constitute a recommendation by Interactive Brokers that you should contract for the services of that third party. Third-party participants who contribute to IBKR Traders’ Insight are independent of Interactive Brokers and Interactive Brokers does not make any representations or warranties concerning the services offered, their past or future performance, or the accuracy of the information provided by the third party. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

This material is from New Constructs and is being posted with permission from New Constructs. The views expressed in this material are solely those of the author and/or New Constructs and IBKR is not endorsing or recommending any investment or trading discussed in the material. This material is not and should not be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any security. To the extent that this material discusses general market activity, industry or sector trends or other broad based economic or political conditions, it should not be construed as research or investment advice. To the extent that it includes references to specific securities, commodities, currencies, or other instruments, those references do not constitute a recommendation to buy, sell or hold such security. This material does not and is not intended to take into account the particular financial conditions, investment objectives or requirements of individual customers. Before acting on this material, you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances and, as necessary, seek professional advice.

In accordance with EU regulation: The statements in this document shall not be considered as an objective or independent explanation of the matters. Please note that this document (a) has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research, and (b) is not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination or publication of investment research.

Any trading symbols displayed are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to portray recommendations.

trading top