Market Volatility vs Style Volatility

Equity market volatility has been declining this year and has recently been below the long-run average. However, under the surface of the calm at the major index level, style rotation between Growth and Value has been extremely high.

The first chart below plots two rolling volatility series: the top section is the six-month annualized volatility of the S&P 500 index, while the bottom section is the volatility of the daily difference between the S&P 500 Pure Growth and Pure Value index returns. The dashed horizontal lines indicate the long-run average for each series.

S&P 500 and pure growth value rolling 6-month volatility

Source: Mill Street Research, Factset, Bloomberg

The volatility of Growth/Value relative returns remains extremely elevated compared to historical norms, recently rivaling the prior peaks in the 2008-09 period and 2000-01 period. Notably, the current rolling six-month readings overlap with a steady, low-volatility advance in the overall US equity market.

High volatility in Growth/Value style performance is likely causing headaches for some active equity portfolio managers, as most cannot switch between styles quickly (if at all), and thus must endure alternating shorter-term bouts of beating or lagging the overall market. And investors being whipsawed by heavy style volatility within portfolios may be one reason there is still just enough nervousness to prevent investors from becoming so excessively optimistic that it becomes a market headwind from a contrarian sentiment standpoint.

If relative returns are more volatile than usual, what about relative fundamentals? Our aggregated sector earnings estimate revisions data (chart below) comparing cyclical (Value-oriented) sectors1 with Growth sectors2 continues to show a historically strong bias toward Value-oriented sectors relative to Growth. That is, analysts are raising estimates within cyclical/Value sectors more broadly than they are within Growth sectors, and have been for some time now.

However, the latest readings are down somewhat from the recent historic peak. Perhaps this recent behavior in revisions has increased debate about whether “this is as good as it gets for Value fundamentals” (i.e., time to buy Growth), or “Value lagged for a long time and still has powerful fundamental tailwinds, stay with the Value trend”.

US Cyclical growth relative revisions breadth

Source: Mill Street Research, Factset, Bloomberg

Our current view continues to support a tilt toward Value/Cyclical sectors, but with the knowledge that heavy rotation makes it a bumpy ride.

1 Cyclical sectors include Energy, Materials, Industrials, Consumer Discretionary, and Financials
2 Growth sectors include Technology, Communication Services, and Health Care

Originally Posted on August 4, 2021 – Market Volatility vs Style Volatility

Disclosure: Mill Street Research

Source for data and statistics: Mill Street Research, FactSet, Bloomberg

This report is not intended to provide investment advice. This report does not constitute an offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities discussed herein in any jurisdiction where such offer or solicitation would be prohibited. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results, and no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made regarding future performance of any security mentioned in this report.

All information, opinions and statistical data contained in this report were obtained or derived from public sources believed to be reliable, but Mill Street does not represent that any such information, opinion or statistical data is accurate or complete. All estimates, opinions and recommendations expressed herein constitute judgments as of the date of this report and are subject to change without notice.

Disclosure: Interactive Brokers

Information posted on IBKR Traders’ Insight that is provided by third-parties and not by Interactive Brokers does NOT constitute a recommendation by Interactive Brokers that you should contract for the services of that third party. Third-party participants who contribute to IBKR Traders’ Insight are independent of Interactive Brokers and Interactive Brokers does not make any representations or warranties concerning the services offered, their past or future performance, or the accuracy of the information provided by the third party. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

This material is from Mill Street Research and is being posted with permission from Mill Street Research. The views expressed in this material are solely those of the author and/or Mill Street Research and IBKR is not endorsing or recommending any investment or trading discussed in the material. This material is not and should not be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any security. To the extent that this material discusses general market activity, industry or sector trends or other broad based economic or political conditions, it should not be construed as research or investment advice. To the extent that it includes references to specific securities, commodities, currencies, or other instruments, those references do not constitute a recommendation to buy, sell or hold such security. This material does not and is not intended to take into account the particular financial conditions, investment objectives or requirements of individual customers. Before acting on this material, you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances and, as necessary, seek professional advice.

In accordance with EU regulation: The statements in this document shall not be considered as an objective or independent explanation of the matters. Please note that this document (a) has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research, and (b) is not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination or publication of investment research.

Any trading symbols displayed are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to portray recommendations.