By: Greg Kuhl and Danny Greenberger
Portfolio Managers Greg Kuhl and Danny Greenberger explain why they believe the REIT “reopening rotation” trade has created an attractive opportunity to buy quality compounders offering sustainable growth, driven by long-term structural tailwinds.
- The growth prospects of many real estate companies exposed to powerful secular tailwinds have improved and look to continue improving as a result of the pandemic.
- However, in the aftermath of recent underperformance versus the wider REITs sector, “growth” REITs have seen their valuation premiums disappear.
- Performance differentials between “value” and growth real estate sectors has become stretched based on fundamentals, creating potential buying opportunities.
Since the announcement of the Pfizer vaccine’s efficacy against COVID-19 on 9 November, alongside the wider equity markets, we have seen a significant rotation to “value” within the real estate investment trust (REIT) market. Specifically, while the overall U.S. REIT sector has gained 14% since that day, value REITs are up 52% on average, while “growth” REITs have been declined by 7%.1
The rotation away from growth real estate sectors that have directly benefited from COVID (industrial/logistics, cell towers, data centers, single-family rental housing, storage) toward value sectors that have been negatively impacted by COVID (shopping centers, regional malls, hotels, office, coastal apartments) has been strong, and has happened in a very short space of time.
Identifying “Quality Compounders”
A recovery trade in the hardest hit real estate sectors was both expected and justified. Better‑than‑expected vaccine announcements signaled the beginning of a return to normalcy and ongoing government stimulus cushioned the pandemic’s impact on the consumer. A focus on “cheap, but not broken” names (i.e., stocks severely punished by the market but which could still offer a reasonable path to sustainable growth) has been beneficial, albeit some structurally impaired sectors, such as retail, have rallied the hardest. While the current trading momentum shows few signs of abating, we believe the performance differentials between value and growth real estate sectors have become stretched based on the underlying value of property assets (i.e., fundamentals).
As a result, we believe relative value has emerged in high-quality REITs that continue to benefit from steady, long-term structural growth tailwinds. We refer to these companies as “quality compounders.”
Growth Versus Value: So Much Has Changed in a Year
REITs in growth sectors offer highly visible long-term compounding return potential, driven by permanent and powerful secular tailwinds such as e-commerce, mobile data, cloud computing, 5G and changing demographics. The growth prospects of many real estate companies exposed to these trends have improved and look to continue improving as a result of the pandemic. However, in the aftermath of recent underperformance of the wider REITs sector, these companies have seen their previously high valuation premium disappear.
Figure 1: Historical Price-to-NAV Spread (Growth v. Value)
Source: Evercore ISI Research, as at 1 March 2021. Past performance is not a guide to future performance. Note: Net asset value (NAV) per share represents the estimated private market value of REIT-owned properties. “Growth” includes Industrial, Single Family Rentals, Manufactured Housing, Storage, Life Science Office sectors. “Value” includes Shopping Centers, Malls, Traditional Office, Healthcare, Coastal Apartments, Student Accommodation.
In contrast, some companies that remain on the wrong end of structural change and are at risk of disintermediation (such as retail REITs) have seen their share prices recently soar above pre-COVID levels. Even given credit for a return to normality, a permanent impairment to income and valuations feels inevitable. Despite this, growth REITs are now trading at a Price-to-NAV discount relative to value REITs (see Figure 1), a phenomenon last seen in August 2018. This compares to a spread (differential) in the Price-to-NAV ratios between value and growth, which stood at 25% in October last year, and has averaged 11% over the past three years to March 2021.2
Figure 2 shows two-year forward earnings growth expectations for growth versus value companies. Here we can see that the valuation moves of late are at odds with current market consensus expectations, with estimates for the value sectors having come down sharply, while estimates for the growth sectors have increased.
Figure 2: 2-Year Forward Cumulative FFO per Share Growth
Source: Janus Henderson Investors, Evercore ISI Research company classifications. Data based on 2-year forward market consensus FFO per share estimates to 31 March 2021. Funds from Operations (FFO) is used by REITs to define the cash flow from their operations; i.e., a measure of operating performance. The FFO per share ratio is typically used to evaluate a REIT in lieu of earnings per share (EPS) used to evaluate general equities.
Growth Opportunities Abound
We believe that the market is attaching a more positive outlook to certain property types, which rely more on hope and continued economic recovery momentum, rather than fundamentals. Equally, the market appears to be underestimating the long-term growth potential of best‑in‑class REITs that have the ability to grow, create significant shareholder value and potentially offer superior property returns in the coming years.
In summary, we believe this level of valuation divergence between value and growth has created a compelling opportunity – a rare chance to buy some of the highest quality publicly traded real estate companies, operating in sectors that look to be on the right side of change, at attractive valuations.
1“Growth” and “value” are based and adapted from current Evercore ISI Research characterizations. These can be thought of as “COVID outperformers” and “COVID underperformers,” respectively. Source: Bloomberg. MSCI US REIT Index, value and growth buckets, total returns in U.S. dollars from 9 November 2020 to 8 March 2021. Past performance is not a guide to future performance.
2Source: Bloomberg, MSCI U.S. REIT Index, data as at 1 March 2021. Net asset value (NAV) represents the estimated private market value of REIT-owned properties. Price-to-NAV shows how expensive a REIT is compared to its Net Asset Value. Price-to-NAV discount means a REIT trading price is lower than its net asset value (estimated private market value of REIT-owned properties).
Disintermediation: Occurs when products and services are sold directly to consumers, rather than through stores, e.g., e-commerce.
Originally Posted on March 16, 2021 – Right Here, Right Now: Growth Opportunities in Real Estate
Disclosure: Janus Henderson
The opinions and views expressed are as of the date published and are subject to change without notice. They are for information purposes only and should not be used or construed as an offer to sell, a solicitation of an offer to buy, or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security, investment strategy or market sector. No forecasts can be guaranteed. Opinions and examples are meant as an illustration of broader themes and are not an indication of trading intent. It is not intended to indicate or imply that any illustration/example mentioned is now or was ever held in any portfolio. Janus Henderson Group plc through its subsidiaries may manage investment products with a financial interest in securities mentioned herein and any comments should not be construed as a reflection on the past or future profitability. There is no guarantee that the information supplied is accurate, complete, or timely, nor are there any warranties with regards to the results obtained from its use. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Investing involves risk, including the possible loss of principal and fluctuation of value.
Disclosure: Interactive Brokers
Information posted on IBKR Traders’ Insight that is provided by third-parties and not by Interactive Brokers does NOT constitute a recommendation by Interactive Brokers that you should contract for the services of that third party. Third-party participants who contribute to IBKR Traders’ Insight are independent of Interactive Brokers and Interactive Brokers does not make any representations or warranties concerning the services offered, their past or future performance, or the accuracy of the information provided by the third party. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
This material is from Janus Henderson and is being posted with permission from Janus Henderson. The views expressed in this material are solely those of the author and/or Janus Henderson and IBKR is not endorsing or recommending any investment or trading discussed in the material. This material is not and should not be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any security. To the extent that this material discusses general market activity, industry or sector trends or other broad based economic or political conditions, it should not be construed as research or investment advice. To the extent that it includes references to specific securities, commodities, currencies, or other instruments, those references do not constitute a recommendation to buy, sell or hold such security. This material does not and is not intended to take into account the particular financial conditions, investment objectives or requirements of individual customers. Before acting on this material, you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances and, as necessary, seek professional advice.